Ian WhiteTucker Carlson wanted Mike Vick Executed
December 30th 2010 05:38
Category: No Category
"I'm a Christian, I've made mistakes myself, I believe fervently in second chances," Carlson said on the show. "But Michael Vick killed dogs, and he did [it] in a heartless and cruel way. And I think, personally, he should've been executed for that. He wasn't, but the idea that the president of the United States would be getting behind someone who murdered dogs?"
Let's rewind for a second. Say the first part again Tucker.
"I'm a Christian, I've made mistakes myself, I believe fervently in second chances."
You ever notice when somebody prefaces a statement by alerting us that they're Christian, they usually say something that totally contradicts their doctrine?
But okay, you're a Christian. Thus you supposedly follow the example of Jesus Christ, accept that you’re flawed, don’t judge, promote kindness, love, turning the other cheek, so on and so forth. Then also the 10 commandments, don't steal, no killing, no cheating on your god, etc. Alright got it. Continue.
"But Michael Vick killed dogs, and he did [it] in a heartless and cruel way. And I think, personally, he should've been executed for that. He wasn't, but the idea that the president of the United States would be getting behind someone who murdered dogs?"
Uh, Tucker? Refer to line one. Oh wait, that's right. You're a hyperbolic racist on a propaganda network. Christianity is merely the shield that protects your hypocrisy.
Everyone is so shocked and can't fathom why he said such a thing. Really? It's because he hates black people, it's that simple. How often has he called for a public execution? And for dogs? Why do animals, particularly in America home of dog racing, hunting, horse racing, and animal skin garments, have a higher value than humans? Some people that kill humans don't even get jail time. Heck, Vick only was in jail for that long because they wanted to make an example out of him. It was his first offense and it was for financing the fights. You can't tell me the rules just magically go out the window for Michael Vick. Something about bankrolling animal cruelty calls for execution? Not starting a war to control oil profits? Not priests touching little boys? A football player financing a dogfight? Give me a break. They're dogs, not unicorns. Tucker Carlson is a hateful, ignorant, douche, with terrible fashion sense and I hope he dies in a fire.
Let's rewind for a second. Say the first part again Tucker.
"I'm a Christian, I've made mistakes myself, I believe fervently in second chances."
You ever notice when somebody prefaces a statement by alerting us that they're Christian, they usually say something that totally contradicts their doctrine?
But okay, you're a Christian. Thus you supposedly follow the example of Jesus Christ, accept that you’re flawed, don’t judge, promote kindness, love, turning the other cheek, so on and so forth. Then also the 10 commandments, don't steal, no killing, no cheating on your god, etc. Alright got it. Continue.
"But Michael Vick killed dogs, and he did [it] in a heartless and cruel way. And I think, personally, he should've been executed for that. He wasn't, but the idea that the president of the United States would be getting behind someone who murdered dogs?"
Uh, Tucker? Refer to line one. Oh wait, that's right. You're a hyperbolic racist on a propaganda network. Christianity is merely the shield that protects your hypocrisy.
Everyone is so shocked and can't fathom why he said such a thing. Really? It's because he hates black people, it's that simple. How often has he called for a public execution? And for dogs? Why do animals, particularly in America home of dog racing, hunting, horse racing, and animal skin garments, have a higher value than humans? Some people that kill humans don't even get jail time. Heck, Vick only was in jail for that long because they wanted to make an example out of him. It was his first offense and it was for financing the fights. You can't tell me the rules just magically go out the window for Michael Vick. Something about bankrolling animal cruelty calls for execution? Not starting a war to control oil profits? Not priests touching little boys? A football player financing a dogfight? Give me a break. They're dogs, not unicorns. Tucker Carlson is a hateful, ignorant, douche, with terrible fashion sense and I hope he dies in a fire.
| 30 |
| Vote |
subscribe to this blog
Comment by nightlydvdreview
Nightly DVD Review
Cinema Voyage
Green and Healthy
The Writer's Nook
For example:
I can say that I have no problem with two people (gay or straight) having a marriage recognized by the government.
I can say that I have no problem with abortion.
AND I AM A CHRISTIAN.
So, how can I say those things?
Let's look at them both.
The Bible speaks against homosexuality in both the old and new testaments. Therefore, I do not believe the government should be able to force a church to marry two people who are going against the teachings in the Bible.
Likewise, I don't think the Church has any business telling the government that they cannot allow civil unions.
"Render to Ceasar that which is Ceasar's and to God that which is God's." - Jesus
That shows that biblically, a separation of Church and state is not only approved, but mandated.
With Abortion? In the Old Testament, it was said that if someone harms a woman who is with child and, because of that, she has a miscarriage, that person is to pay a fine. What did it say for killing someone? That they should be put to death.
Therefore, even Biblically, abortion does not = murder. Those who say it does, have not read their Bible. However, there is some problem with the law in this regard.
If the fetus is not living, and does not have the right to life, how can it have the right to inherit? But we have laws that protect the unborn's right to inherit. Not to mention, we also have people sitting in jail for murder (mostly 2nd degree) for causing a woman to miscarry. So the law, in those cases contradict themselves.
Something that is NOT a living being, cannot inherit. (I can't leave my television to my favorite tree.)
Something that is NOT a living being, cannot be murdered, (not even 2nd degree or manslaughter.)
There must be changes made so the law does not show confusion.